<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: GeoServer and Google&#8217;s Geo Search</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.geoserver.org/2008/05/13/geoserver-and-googles-geo-search/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.geoserver.org/2008/05/13/geoserver-and-googles-geo-search/</link>
	<description>Everything GeoServer, and a little more</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Dec 2011 16:57:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Holmes</title>
		<link>http://blog.geoserver.org/2008/05/13/geoserver-and-googles-geo-search/comment-page-1/#comment-28651</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Holmes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 17:56:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.geoserver.org/2008/05/13/geoserver-and-googles-geo-search/#comment-28651</guid>
		<description>Can you tell me more about the full support of HTML?  What does that add that wasn&#039;t there before?  Will it execute javascript?  

I guess the thing that would worry me though is having it not working with older versions of Google Earth, how do older versions handle features that are only in the latest?

Dynamic charts should be possible using dynamic symbolizers, see thread on http://www.nabble.com/Dynamic-symbolizers-plus-google-charts--to22291811.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can you tell me more about the full support of HTML?  What does that add that wasn&#8217;t there before?  Will it execute javascript?  </p>
<p>I guess the thing that would worry me though is having it not working with older versions of Google Earth, how do older versions handle features that are only in the latest?</p>
<p>Dynamic charts should be possible using dynamic symbolizers, see thread on <a href="http://www.nabble.com/Dynamic-symbolizers-plus-google-charts--to22291811.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.nabble.com/Dynamic-symbolizers-plus-google-charts&#8211;to22291811.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark de Blois</title>
		<link>http://blog.geoserver.org/2008/05/13/geoserver-and-googles-geo-search/comment-page-1/#comment-27956</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark de Blois</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2009 20:06:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.geoserver.org/2008/05/13/geoserver-and-googles-geo-search/#comment-27956</guid>
		<description>Integration with Google&#039;s Geo Search is fantastic! It would be even more fantastic if there would be more flexibility in the creation of dynamic kml (e.g. firing up dynamic charts based on db content). Any plans in that direction?!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Integration with Google&#8217;s Geo Search is fantastic! It would be even more fantastic if there would be more flexibility in the creation of dynamic kml (e.g. firing up dynamic charts based on db content). Any plans in that direction?!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark de Blois</title>
		<link>http://blog.geoserver.org/2008/05/13/geoserver-and-googles-geo-search/comment-page-1/#comment-27954</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark de Blois</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2009 19:53:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.geoserver.org/2008/05/13/geoserver-and-googles-geo-search/#comment-27954</guid>
		<description>Exposing the data to Google search is great, really nice work! The KML &#039;dynamic&#039; output using templates is a start but with Google Earth 5&#039;s full support for HTML it would be fantastic if dynamic charts based on db content could be included for example. Are there any thoughts along these lines, examples of hacks, etc.?!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exposing the data to Google search is great, really nice work! The KML &#8216;dynamic&#8217; output using templates is a start but with Google Earth 5&#8242;s full support for HTML it would be fantastic if dynamic charts based on db content could be included for example. Are there any thoughts along these lines, examples of hacks, etc.?!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GeoServer and the World Glacier Inventory - GeoServer Blog</title>
		<link>http://blog.geoserver.org/2008/05/13/geoserver-and-googles-geo-search/comment-page-1/#comment-26602</link>
		<dc:creator>GeoServer and the World Glacier Inventory - GeoServer Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 16:50:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.geoserver.org/2008/05/13/geoserver-and-googles-geo-search/#comment-26602</guid>
		<description>[...] Earth.  And look for the World Glacier Inventory to be available on Google Maps soon, as part of GeoServer&#8217;s integration with Google&#8217;s Geo Search.   This entry was written by Mike Pumphrey, posted on February 4, 2009 at 11:50 am, filed under [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Earth.  And look for the World Glacier Inventory to be available on Google Maps soon, as part of GeoServer&#8217;s integration with Google&#8217;s Geo Search.   This entry was written by Mike Pumphrey, posted on February 4, 2009 at 11:50 am, filed under [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Fee GIS Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; GeoServer 1.7.2 continues improvements to Cartography</title>
		<link>http://blog.geoserver.org/2008/05/13/geoserver-and-googles-geo-search/comment-page-1/#comment-26075</link>
		<dc:creator>James Fee GIS Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; GeoServer 1.7.2 continues improvements to Cartography</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 03:37:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.geoserver.org/2008/05/13/geoserver-and-googles-geo-search/#comment-26075</guid>
		<description>[...] for the 1.7.3 release, slated for release in the next month, which will include improvements to Geo Search, and the official release of the REST configuration [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] for the 1.7.3 release, slated for release in the next month, which will include improvements to Geo Search, and the official release of the REST configuration [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GeoServer 1.7.2 Released - GeoServer Blog</title>
		<link>http://blog.geoserver.org/2008/05/13/geoserver-and-googles-geo-search/comment-page-1/#comment-25888</link>
		<dc:creator>GeoServer 1.7.2 Released - GeoServer Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 02:19:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.geoserver.org/2008/05/13/geoserver-and-googles-geo-search/#comment-25888</guid>
		<description>[...] for the 1.7.3 release, slated for release in the next month, which will include improvements to Geo Search, and the official release of the REST configuration API.   This entry was written by Justin [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] for the 1.7.3 release, slated for release in the next month, which will include improvements to Geo Search, and the official release of the REST configuration API.   This entry was written by Justin [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GeoServer 1.7.1 Released - GeoServer Blog</title>
		<link>http://blog.geoserver.org/2008/05/13/geoserver-and-googles-geo-search/comment-page-1/#comment-23671</link>
		<dc:creator>GeoServer 1.7.1 Released - GeoServer Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 16:56:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.geoserver.org/2008/05/13/geoserver-and-googles-geo-search/#comment-23671</guid>
		<description>[...] slated for release in the next month or so, which will include new breakthroughs in support for GeoSearch.   This entry was written by Justin Deoliveira, posted on December 9, 2008 at 11:55 am, filed under [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] slated for release in the next month or so, which will include new breakthroughs in support for GeoSearch.   This entry was written by Justin Deoliveira, posted on December 9, 2008 at 11:55 am, filed under [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Links List 5.16.08 &#124; Off the Map - Official Blog of FortiusOne</title>
		<link>http://blog.geoserver.org/2008/05/13/geoserver-and-googles-geo-search/comment-page-1/#comment-2377</link>
		<dc:creator>Links List 5.16.08 &#124; Off the Map - Official Blog of FortiusOne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 21:01:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.geoserver.org/2008/05/13/geoserver-and-googles-geo-search/#comment-2377</guid>
		<description>[...] All Points Blog also provides a “plain-English” explanation of the Google / ESRI announcement. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] All Points Blog also provides a “plain-English” explanation of the Google / ESRI announcement. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd Mayberry</title>
		<link>http://blog.geoserver.org/2008/05/13/geoserver-and-googles-geo-search/comment-page-1/#comment-2338</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd Mayberry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 16:12:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.geoserver.org/2008/05/13/geoserver-and-googles-geo-search/#comment-2338</guid>
		<description>Chris, 

Absolutely agree on the Apache for the Geo Web comment. This is great to hear, and we look forward to putting it to use. Now it just comes down to getting agencies, especially those we work with in Jamaica, to share their data.
Do you see watermarks playing a more significant role now?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris, </p>
<p>Absolutely agree on the Apache for the Geo Web comment. This is great to hear, and we look forward to putting it to use. Now it just comes down to getting agencies, especially those we work with in Jamaica, to share their data.<br />
Do you see watermarks playing a more significant role now?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug Nebert</title>
		<link>http://blog.geoserver.org/2008/05/13/geoserver-and-googles-geo-search/comment-page-1/#comment-2337</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug Nebert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 13:53:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.geoserver.org/2008/05/13/geoserver-and-googles-geo-search/#comment-2337</guid>
		<description>I like the premise. I am working towards enabling generation of Geo/Atom feeds as digest from FGDC metadata collections and then the construction of sitemap.xml files, based on our discussions post-GSDI-10. By making the content searchable (Ed Parsons recommended RSS/Atom) it&#039;ll allow us exposure into the main search engines through the registration of the sitemap files. I know that ESRI was dabbling in this with their Portal Toolkit but were unable to get a successful Google harvest going on the Geospatial OneStop. I doubt that all content will be crawlable in ArcGIS Server, but all data collection descriptions might be...

I&#039;ve been in communication with the Geo Search group at Google and they said that only georss:point is recognized for search these days, as most locations are realized as points. They do promise to support box and polygon indexing within the year, however, which will give us more control over finding and ranking geo resources with more complex footprints.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the premise. I am working towards enabling generation of Geo/Atom feeds as digest from FGDC metadata collections and then the construction of sitemap.xml files, based on our discussions post-GSDI-10. By making the content searchable (Ed Parsons recommended RSS/Atom) it&#8217;ll allow us exposure into the main search engines through the registration of the sitemap files. I know that ESRI was dabbling in this with their Portal Toolkit but were unable to get a successful Google harvest going on the Geospatial OneStop. I doubt that all content will be crawlable in ArcGIS Server, but all data collection descriptions might be&#8230;</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been in communication with the Geo Search group at Google and they said that only georss:point is recognized for search these days, as most locations are realized as points. They do promise to support box and polygon indexing within the year, however, which will give us more control over finding and ranking geo resources with more complex footprints.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

