Comments on: Proposal for improving ImagePyramid support (and other small developments) http://blog.geoserver.org/2009/11/18/proposal-for-improving-imagepyramid-support-and-other-small-developments/ Everything GeoServer, and a little more Sat, 31 Jul 2010 17:28:20 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6 hourly 1 By: Phil Scadden http://blog.geoserver.org/2009/11/18/proposal-for-improving-imagepyramid-support-and-other-small-developments/comment-page-1/#comment-63665 Phil Scadden Mon, 07 Dec 2009 01:40:15 +0000 http://blog.geoserver.org/?p=378#comment-63665 Well I am not particularly interested in imagePyramid but the problem of geometry extending across the 180 deg line certainly is an issue. Anyone looking in bids for that? (We are also looking at trying to fix ourselves but ArcGIS GISserver might be best bet). Well I am not particularly interested in imagePyramid but the problem of geometry extending across the 180 deg line certainly is an issue. Anyone looking in bids for that? (We are also looking at trying to fix ourselves but ArcGIS GISserver might be best bet).

]]> By: Frank Warmerdam http://blog.geoserver.org/2009/11/18/proposal-for-improving-imagepyramid-support-and-other-small-developments/comment-page-1/#comment-61163 Frank Warmerdam Sat, 21 Nov 2009 04:26:53 +0000 http://blog.geoserver.org/?p=378#comment-61163 I'm not clear on what is supported now or what exactly is proposed with regard to retile. But I would like to see GeoServer and GeoTools image access to support GDAL "TIFF" overviews in an associated .ovr file. I think that would be very convenient for people working with imagery in a variety of environments. I’m not clear on what is supported now or what exactly is proposed with regard to retile. But I would like to see GeoServer and GeoTools image access to support GDAL “TIFF” overviews in an associated .ovr file. I think that would be very convenient for people working with imagery in a variety of environments.

]]> By: Jody Garnett http://blog.geoserver.org/2009/11/18/proposal-for-improving-imagepyramid-support-and-other-small-developments/comment-page-1/#comment-60972 Jody Garnett Thu, 19 Nov 2009 10:05:30 +0000 http://blog.geoserver.org/?p=378#comment-60972 We already have the "long term roadmap" which is supposed to service this purpose - it meets all the requirements you mentioned (including a contact person). Chris and myself updated it a couple of months ago - but I would like to make it more attractive with pictures and or diagrams. There is no lower limit on the size of work described; only a list of features or fixes that we are enthusiastic about and need resources in order to address We already have the “long term roadmap” which is supposed to service this purpose – it meets all the requirements you mentioned (including a contact person). Chris and myself updated it a couple of months ago – but I would like to make it more attractive with pictures and or diagrams.

There is no lower limit on the size of work described; only a list of features or fixes that we are enthusiastic about and need resources in order to address

]]>