<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Securing RESTful Services with GeoServer 2.0.1</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.geoserver.org/2010/01/26/securing-restful-services-with-geoserver-2-0-1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.geoserver.org/2010/01/26/securing-restful-services-with-geoserver-2-0-1/</link>
	<description>Everything GeoServer, and a little more</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Dec 2011 16:57:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce</title>
		<link>http://blog.geoserver.org/2010/01/26/securing-restful-services-with-geoserver-2-0-1/comment-page-1/#comment-73411</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 May 2010 17:12:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.geoserver.org/?p=438#comment-73411</guid>
		<description>Ah, sorry. I did a tiny bit of digging and I see now that the &quot;restconfig&quot; extension is a separate download and does not appear to be bundled by default. Not as scary as I thought then.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, sorry. I did a tiny bit of digging and I see now that the &#8220;restconfig&#8221; extension is a separate download and does not appear to be bundled by default. Not as scary as I thought then.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amos</title>
		<link>http://blog.geoserver.org/2010/01/26/securing-restful-services-with-geoserver-2-0-1/comment-page-1/#comment-66798</link>
		<dc:creator>Amos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 03:48:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.geoserver.org/?p=438#comment-66798</guid>
		<description>Ah, sorry. I did a tiny bit of digging and I see now that the &quot;restconfig&quot; extension is a separate download and does not appear to be bundled by default. Not as scary as I thought then.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, sorry. I did a tiny bit of digging and I see now that the &#8220;restconfig&#8221; extension is a separate download and does not appear to be bundled by default. Not as scary as I thought then.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amos</title>
		<link>http://blog.geoserver.org/2010/01/26/securing-restful-services-with-geoserver-2-0-1/comment-page-1/#comment-66797</link>
		<dc:creator>Amos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 03:44:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.geoserver.org/?p=438#comment-66797</guid>
		<description>Thanks Justin. I should have also asked: Are the installations vulnerable out of the box or was there something I would have had to turn on?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Justin. I should have also asked: Are the installations vulnerable out of the box or was there something I would have had to turn on?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin Deoliveira</title>
		<link>http://blog.geoserver.org/2010/01/26/securing-restful-services-with-geoserver-2-0-1/comment-page-1/#comment-66779</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin Deoliveira</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 22:02:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.geoserver.org/?p=438#comment-66779</guid>
		<description>@Amos:

At the moment 1.7.x installations are vulnerable yes. At this point a patch has not been back ported.

As for putting a notice on the homepage this blog probably reaches a wider audience than those who visit our homepage daily. And this blog entry should show up in the news feed that is front and center on the home page. Although it has not at this moment. Will have to look into that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Amos:</p>
<p>At the moment 1.7.x installations are vulnerable yes. At this point a patch has not been back ported.</p>
<p>As for putting a notice on the homepage this blog probably reaches a wider audience than those who visit our homepage daily. And this blog entry should show up in the news feed that is front and center on the home page. Although it has not at this moment. Will have to look into that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amos</title>
		<link>http://blog.geoserver.org/2010/01/26/securing-restful-services-with-geoserver-2-0-1/comment-page-1/#comment-66775</link>
		<dc:creator>Amos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 21:54:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.geoserver.org/?p=438#comment-66775</guid>
		<description>Which versions of GeoServer are vulnerable to RESTful GET requests? Are 1.7.x installations vulnerable? Shouldn&#039;t this warrant a big security notice on the home page?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Which versions of GeoServer are vulnerable to RESTful GET requests? Are 1.7.x installations vulnerable? Shouldn&#8217;t this warrant a big security notice on the home page?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

